Just a week ago, I had to choose between the Hillary Hahn concert and the Penderecki Quartet concert where they played Schubert's String Quintet. I ended up switching tickets and saw the Penderecki's, which I think was clearly the right decision.
Yesterday brought a similar dilemma. I had a ticket to see Anakana Schofield talk about her book The Library of Brothel at the TPL Salon. And her book indeed looks fairly interesting, and I almost certainly would have picked up a copy for her to sign. However, I found out that McClelland & Stewart were having a writers' salon over at Paradise. It was impossible to get tickets to it, and in fact most of the tickets went to book industry insiders or to hard-core followers of Atwood. Within a few hours of her leaking the fact that she was going to be at the Paradise the tickets were all gone. I never did get an answer to whether they were going to have rush tickets or not, and in fact I was supposed to be at our Book Club meeting (talking about LeGuin's The Left Hand of Darkness) until 6, which would have made it next to impossible to get to the Paradise early and see about the rush line (and then bike back to the Reference Library if they weren't doing one). However, Book Club was pushed when most of the club members got sucked into this after-work event.
So I biked over to the Paradise (after having gotten my bike back from the shop -- apparently I had a broken link on my bike chain that was causing all the shifting issues). I got there at 6:15 and was at the very front of the line, but there was no one to talk to about the rush line. I decided to stick it out just in case, even though I wouldn't find out anything until they opened the doors at 6:30, which meant I would probably be a bit late for the TPL Salon. (Given that they don't get started exactly on time, and there is a long land acknowledgement, I figured I could still make it work.)
At 6:30, they told me there wasn't an official rush line, but literally the woman in front of me said that she had a spare ticket, so I scampered in. And indeed, I tried to give that woman $20 for the ticket, but she wouldn't take it.* It was pretty clear that Atwood wasn't going to sign anything. I think she is just past the point of wanting to hear from so many people about how her books changed them (and holding up the line for hours), as well as other bad behaviour like bringing 5 or even 10 of her 65 books to be signed (2 or 3 is really the limit). I did haul out my copy of Paper Boats with the UK cover just in case she saw it and was intrigued, but that didn't happen. Still, it was a relatively small crowd, and if she was going to break her own rules and do a signing, this was probably the most likely event for it to happen. I'll just have to settle for the fact that I managed to get two poetry collections signed a bit over 20 years ago when she still did signings. (I wonder when she stopped doing book signings. Was it 10 years ago, or it is a since-COVID thing? She did had some interesting remarks during her conversation with Carol Off about her first terrible book signing in Edmonton.)
Anyway, the first half of the event was to feature 5 writers with newish books coming out from McClelland & Stewart. I haven't heard of any of them, but decided after some browsing to pick up Megha Majumdar's A Guardian and a Thief. Majumdar is the author of A Burning, which was a bit of a big deal a few years back. (Here is a feature on her and her book from the Guardian from five years ago.)
In the first half of the evening, the five authors were interviewed for about 10 minutes each by Elamin Abdelmahmoud (who apparently is late delivering his own book to McClelland & Stewart).
Here he is talking with Sharon Bala about Good Guys, which is a novel about the people behind the scenes of the philanthropy industry (including someone who is a bit a naive about the motivations of donors and someone who is a lot more jaded).
Then he turned to Majumdar and said that he found the ending infuriating (and that he wanted to throw her book against the wall when he finished) but in the best possible way. While I don't know all the details, it is pretty clear that one of the two families spotlighted in the book experiences a terrible tragedy (though whether it is the wealthier one or the desperately poor one is yet to be revealed). I suppose this at least is not as depressing as Mistry's A Fine Balance where everyone suffers at the end. (And I still think that such tragedy porn doesn't really belong on a list of 100 Best Novels of all time...) While the stakes may be nearly as high in Thrity Umrigar's The Space Between Us, the characters, constrained by class and particularly gender, don't seem to make the same sort of outsized decisions.
As Majumdar explained, she wanted to explore how far would someone go to try to save their family in a situation where the pot is already boiling and things keep getting hotter.** (I suspect this book may well be made into a movie, though from the hints that have been dropped, the ending might well need to be changed...) I actually am very slowly making my way through The Space Between Us, and maybe I will move that up to my main reading list, and then after I have read it, tackle A Guardian and a Thief (trying to avoid any more spoilers in the meantime). One of the more interesting elements of the discussion was when they talked about how the boundaries (around whom one loves/cares for and would try to save or at least assist) constantly shifted in the novel, and how it starts with immediate family but can expand or contract to include others. I was struck that this is the same moral dilemma being faced by the executive in Kurosawa's High and Low. (Maybe I should have asked her if that film was an inspiration when I was getting my book signed, but it was the end of a long evening, and I kind of just wanted to go and grab something to eat...)
After the break, where we were encouraged to buy even more books, Atwood came on and had a chat with Carol Off. It was pretty much what one expects from Atwood, a mix of insight into how the spirit of the age made its way into her novels, particularly The Edible Woman, which was the main focus of the talk, and wry comments about how things have changed (or rather not changed enough). One interesting tidbit is that she said her boss at Canadian Facts was actually a truly nice woman (who was therefore not in The Edible Woman) and that the "office virgins" later on told her that they were pleased to have been included. I actually read (and reviewed!) The Edible Woman five years ago, so I probably will hold off from re-re-reading it for some time, but I am due to reread Surfacing soon.
It was a good evening, though I was pretty tired at the end. I stopped by the burrito place near Spadina and grabbed something to go. I didn't actually make it home and eat until about 10:30!
Tonight shouldn't be quite so entirely crazy. I had wanted to see Eric St. Laurent at the Jazz Bistro, but I will swing by Alumnae instead to look at the space, particularly our storage area for props, etc. Then go to the Jazz Bistro for the 8:30 show with Brian Dickinson and Neil Swainson. So it will probably be another late night, and I'll have to figure out where to eat beforehand, since I don't really like the food at the Jazz Bistro at all. I was thinking about backtracking to drop off stuff at Robarts, but I could actually do that on Sat. and combine that with seeing Tafelmusik at Koerner Hall. Which means I have a bit of an opening on Sat. morning, and I should be able to make it over to the framers and then potentially swing by 401 Richmond and/or the AGO. (Or maybe just nap...)
* There were definitely other no shows, so I think they probably could have and even should have said there would be a rush line, but it wasn't my call. I am going to try the same technique to get into the poetry reading next week at the Tranzac Club, where tickets have been unavailable since the moment they put the event details up on the website. (I think having 10 poets reading and likely most of them were given comp tickets made the numbers just not work for the general public...)
** And in fact the novel is set in a near-future version of Kolkata where climate change is making the place pretty much unlivable, and the middle class family actually has a plan to escape the city, but they just need to wait seven days for their visas to arrive. So one can pretty much see how this would play out in a movie. Anyway, complete speculation on my part, but I suspect that the fact that Majumdar was raised in India, next to people with such vastly different life chances, makes her more aware of, if not more accepting of, the fact that there are such very clear winners and losers in life. Despite all the mounting evidence against it, most middle class North Americans are basically optimists that feel everyone could be a winner (and this is why the ending, whatever the finally tragedy, is so upsetting to so many people). As an aside, this need for happy endings has implications in the political realm, as "realists" do so poorly against optimists (no matter how ignorant). Also, urban planners are almost forbidden to talk about anything other than win-win solutions. They (the public at large, I guess) might as well believe in fairy tales...




























